🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years building community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Māori wards indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.