🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly experienced the burden of her family heritage. As the offspring of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the best-known British artists of the turn of the 20th century, Avril’s name was cloaked in the long shadows of history.

An Inaugural Recording

Not long ago, I sat with these shadows as I prepared to produce the first-ever recording of the composer’s piano concerto from 1936. With its impassioned harmonies, expressive melodies, and confident beats, Avril’s work will grant audiences valuable perspective into how the composer – a composer during war born in 1903 – conceived of her world as a artist with mixed heritage.

Legacy and Reality

However about shadows. It requires time to adapt, to recognize outlines as they really are, to distinguish truth from misinterpretation, and I had been afraid to face her history for some time.

I earnestly desired Avril to be following in her father’s footsteps. In some ways, that held. The rustic British sounds of parental inspiration can be observed in many of her works, for example From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to review the names of her family’s music to see how he identified as not only a champion of English Romanticism but a voice of the Black diaspora.

At this point parent and child seemed to diverge.

The United States judged Samuel by the mastery of his art rather than the colour of his skin.

Parental Heritage

While he was studying at the prestigious music college, Samuel – the offspring of a parent from Sierra Leone and a white English mother – turned toward his African roots. When the poet of color Paul Laurence Dunbar visited the UK in that era, the young musician actively pursued him. He set the poet’s African Romances as a composition and the subsequent year incorporated his poetry for an opera, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral work that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an worldwide sensation, especially with Black Americans who felt indirect honor as white America assessed his work by the brilliance of his art as opposed to the his race.

Principles and Actions

Fame did not reduce his activism. In 1900, he participated in the pioneering African conference in the UK where he encountered the prominent scholar this influential figure and saw a range of talks, such as the oppression of Black South Africans. He remained an advocate throughout his life. He kept connections with pioneers of civil rights including the scholar and the educator Washington, delivered his own speeches on racial equality, and even engaged in dialogue on matters of race with President Theodore Roosevelt on a trip to the presidential residence in that year. In terms of his art, the scholar reflected, “he established his reputation so high as a creative artist that it will endure.” He died in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. However, how would Samuel have made of his daughter’s decision to travel to South Africa in the mid-20th century?

Conflict and Policy

“Offspring of Renowned Musician expresses approval to South African policy,” declared a title in the African American magazine Jet magazine. Apartheid “struck me as the right policy”, she informed Jet. When pushed to clarify, she backtracked: she didn’t agree with the system “in principle” and it “could be left to resolve itself, directed by well-meaning South Africans of every background”. If Avril had been more attuned to her family’s principles, or raised in segregated America, she could have hesitated about the policy. Yet her life had protected her.

Background and Inexperience

“I have a British passport,” she said, “and the officials never asked me about my background.” So, with her “porcelain-white” appearance (as described), she moved within European circles, lifted by their admiration for her deceased parent. She gave a talk about her parent’s compositions at the University of Cape Town and conducted the national orchestra in Johannesburg, featuring the bold final section of her composition, subtitled: “In remembrance of my Father.” Even though a skilled pianist herself, she avoided playing as the featured artist in her piece. Rather, she always led as the conductor; and so the apartheid orchestra played under her baton.

The composer aspired, according to her, she “may foster a transformation”. Yet in the mid-1950s, things fell apart. When government agents became aware of her Black ancestry, she could no longer stay the nation. Her UK document failed to safeguard her, the diplomatic official urged her to go or face arrest. She went back to the UK, embarrassed as the magnitude of her inexperience became clear. “The realization was a hard one,” she expressed. Increasing her disgrace was the printing that year of her unfortunate magazine feature, a year after her sudden departure from the country.

A Common Narrative

As I sat with these shadows, I felt a familiar story. The account of being British until it’s revoked – one that calls to mind Black soldiers who defended the English during the global conflict and survived only to be refused rightful benefits. Along with the Windrush era,